<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scoring Vendors&#8217; Responses Offline With Excel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.supplierselect.com/2007/10/20/excel-import-export-for-scoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.supplierselect.com/2007/10/20/excel-import-export-for-scoring/</link>
	<description>Features, Service Announcements and Top Tips</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 20:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SupplierSelect News &#187; News Archive &#187; University RFP managed through SupplierSelect</title>
		<link>http://news.supplierselect.com/2007/10/20/excel-import-export-for-scoring/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>SupplierSelect News &#187; News Archive &#187; University RFP managed through SupplierSelect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 19:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.supplierselect.com/2007/03/26/excel-import-export-for-scoring/#comment-686</guid>
		<description>[...] using SupplierSelect&#8217;s multiple score set functionality, with many users choosing to use evaluate RFP responses offline before importing the scores back into SupplierSelect for aggregation and analysis.  4 different [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] using SupplierSelect&#8217;s multiple score set functionality, with many users choosing to use evaluate RFP responses offline before importing the scores back into SupplierSelect for aggregation and analysis.  4 different [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- turgenev -->

